Mark Driscoll (Pastor of Mars Hill Church in Seattle, founder of the church planting network Acts29 and the new missional web resource Resurgence, and author of Radical Reformission) emailed me a couple of months ago and asked if I wanted to read and blog review his new book Confessions of a Reformission Rev: Hard Lessons from an Emerging Missional Church. I was pumped, agreed, and received a pre-publication version of the book in the mail from Zondervan and read through it near the beginning of January.
I'm going to approach the review in three phases.
I.
The Boring Details: how long, when published, etc.
II. Themes, Quotes & Content: hitting a few themes and highlights.
III. My Take & Recommendation: why you MUST read this book.
I have found this to be a difficult book to put in a one-post review. I considered doing multiple posts, but since the book isn't out yet I would end up giving up too much of the content and you would have to take my word for it. I would rather you read the book. So consider this an extended trailer that should encourage you to pick up the book. Consider this a tray of Turkish Delight. I want you to read and be hungry for more.
So away we go.
I. The Boring Details
The book is due out on May 1st, 2006 and is Driscoll's honest look at the 9 year run of Mars Hill (planting and pastoring). The church has gone from a few people in his living room to more than 4,000, and he has a strategic plan to take it to 10,000 and more.
Mark has already posted a brief excerpt from the book as well as the table of contents. I won't repeat those here. Suffice it to say the chapters are based on attendance, so he deals with issues at each stage of numerical growth. Each chapter is followed by reflection questions, and these are actually ones you won't skip. Very helpful.
Before the "meat" of the book you get Chapter Zero, which is "Ten Curious Questions" and deals with lingo, theology, and ecclesiology to build a missional foundation before talking about their church story. The first appendix is called "The Junk Drawer" and deals with common questions people have about Mars Hill. The second appendix lists distinctives of larger churches. There are endnotes as well. All-in-all the book is about 200 pages long.
II. Themes, Quotes & Content
Emerging Church Issues
Driscoll early on points out his connection to the Emerging Church Movement, but he is careful to distance himself from Emergent. He says, "I myself swim in the theologically conservative stream of the emerging church" (p 22), but also says, "the emergent church is the latest version of liberalism. The only difference is that old liberalism accomodated modernity and the new liberalism accomodates postmodernity" (p 21).
I assure you that I speak as one within the Emerging Church Movement who has great love and appreciation for Christian leaders with theological convictions much different from my own. And because the movement has defined itself as a conversation, I would hope there would be room in the conversation for those who disagree, even poke a bit of fun, but earnestly desire to learn from and journey with those also striving to be faithful to God and fruitful in emerging churches. Standing with my brothers and sisters in our great mission, I hope this book can in some small way help the greater church emerge in biblical faithfulness and missional fruitfulness. (p 23)
Knowing and Hearing God
In Confessions you can't miss the idea that God is not silent in the work of Driscoll and Mars Hill, and that He speaks in amazing ways. Driscoll speaks often of "The Ghost" (his Holy Spirit term).
He tells us why he started Mars Hill, "God had spoken to me in one of those weird charismatic moments and told me to start a church" (p 39). Before they launched their first service Driscoll had a "prophetic dream" that told him to ditch a guy who would eventually try to take over as pastor. Driscoll showed up to the first service and found the guy in the exact circumstances of his dream and told him to get lost before the service even began. Not the best way to build a welcoming atmosphere, but necessary.
Driscoll later tells the story of a demon-possessed guy who came in the service and disrupted it. God told Mark to go to the front of the church during a time of prayer just before the demon-possessed guy started acting out. The book is sprinkled with these sorts of stories, talk of spiritual attacks and "bad angels" talking to his daughter, prophetic dreams (both from God and Satan), even "words of knowledge" (p 121). Sure to be provocative.
Mistakes & Frustrations
Mark confesses his major mistakes in starting and leading Mars Hill. At first they had no clear
leadership structure, relationships were too connected to him, he didn't draw
clear theological lines, and the church was broke.
With some clearly articulated goals written out by Mark, they began to work
toward a more biblical church, and it began to grow. Driscoll is open about his mistakes throughout the book.
Driscoll talked about his frustrations being in an immature church with less than manly
men. He tells one hilarious story of a guy who called him in the middle
of the night upset because he watched a porno and masturbated. Well,
that's not hilarious. But the way Driscoll talks about it is hilarious,
and his response to the guy was, "A naked lady is good to look at, so get
a job, get a wife, ask her to get naked, and look at her instead" (p
60). This is typical Driscollian bluntness, and it works for him. He seems to use frustrations to push him toward prophetic sorts of responses. You will laugh at his strangely courageous moments, and wonder if you are being too soft with those who frustrate you. Will you do what Jesus wants or what the people want?
You don't get the impression from the book that getting from a few people to 4,000 has been easy. It's been rough. There have been problem people ("nut jobs"), pastoral mistakes, spiritual struggles, and even the near miss involving Driscoll, a massage from a hot lady, and the decision to run from rather than receive sexual favors (p 128). Driscoll's openness to his own problems is helpful.
Theological Issues
Ecclesiology is a big issue in the book, especially dealing with church polity. Of congregational ecclesiology he says, "As I studied the Bible, I found more warrant for a church led by unicorns than by majority vote. Practically, it seemed obvious that a congregationally governed church would not be led but would instead make decisions by compromise to appease all of the various interests in the church" (p 103). Driscoll instead holds to elder ecclesiology and his thoughts should be challenging to those with other positions. He should also be challenging as a complementarian who believes the biblical view is for male eldership.
Buzz
Future
Driscoll believes that comfort is an enemy at Mars Hill and so he has to keep the church ready to charge hell with their squirt guns instead of becoming complacent. To do that Driscoll and the elders strategically blow up the settlements of MHC and push toward risky and bold goals. They buy more property, add more services, and decided that Mark should stop being the pastor of everyone and instead transition to being more of a "missiologist-preacher." They have now begun to move toward so many venues and services that some are video rather than Mark preaching each one. And they are adding a bunch more elders and some staff to serve and lead the church. They have decided not to be happy with where they are.
Their mission is much bigger than growing a megachurch of more than 10,000. Though they have a lot to focus on internally (Driscoll says they are like a "kite in a hurricane"), they have a church planting network and are continuously planting churches and discipling new planters.
III. My Take & Recommendation
This has been one of the most important books on church and ministry I have read, and I think will hold a unique place among books about ministry. My advice? Get this book. Read it. Reread it. Give it away. It's most helpful for pastors and planters since it deals a lot with dealing with preaching, logistics, pastor's family issues, church growth, etc. But I highly recommended for all church leaders and thoughtful Christians.
Where could this book be better? I don't know. Some people will be offended at Driscoll's "in your face" approach. Some will disagree with his reformed theology, his ecclesiology, his charismatic tendencies, his complementarianism, and more. I have my concerns with some of the practicals, like video venue preaching. I'm concerned that a lot of Driscoll's ministry is founded upon his personality. I'm concerned that there may be better ways to go than to build a monstrous church. These are some of the things I've wrestled with in this book and found myself wondering if there might be a better way to go.
But I don't answer to God for Driscoll and Mars Hill. Driscoll does. And I don't have his growth problems, unfortunately. And one of the things he points out in the book is that he has learned to be more careful in his criticisms of others (such as Rick Warren) because it's easy to disagree with the big church guy who is seeing so many good things happen that there are few ideal options open. Instead of considering how to disagree with Driscoll's directions, I encourage you to read the book, be thankful for what God is doing, and learn from it.
Now some positives. Conservative evangelicals need to learn from Driscoll's willingness to identify with the "emerging" church while distancing himself from movements within it that he finds problematic (at the least). By considering himself an insider, he has influence that many evangelicals who only scold the ECM will never have.
I hope this book will be read by many who are practical (or theological) cessationists. Driscoll's "Ghost" stories will be shocking to much of the frigid American Church. I hope this book sparks discussions on the miraculous, the supernatural, the voice of God, the will of God, and more. I hope this book will be widely read and cause many of us to say, "How is God speaking to us?"
For all I've written about, I've neglected so many good things in this book. I've left out lists and charts and stories and systems and ideas that have already become a part of my thinking with my local church. It's a theology book, a missiology book, and a practical book. You will find help no matter what kind of church you are in, where you are located, or what size you are.
I think most of all Confessions is a Jesus book. You cannot help but to read and feel that Jesus is the focus of Driscoll and Mars Hill around every corner. Driscoll writes, "My answer to everything is pretty much the same: open the Bible and preach about the person of Jesus and his mission for our church" (p 86). Good advice.
I think many who read this book will be awakened from their bland Christian slumber to ask good questions of ourselves and our churches. May we hear and respond to the voice of the Ghost, preach Jesus and be on His mission, and have our churches buzzing from the work that God is doing.
Thanks, Steve. Mark's a gift to the Body. He's in an interesting transitional season. I'm looking forward to this read as it seems to be a "selah" of sorts for him. As he builds an alter to the Lord I'm sure many of us will benefit.
Posted by: James | 02/17/2006 at 12:48 PM
"Turkish delight"?! Are you saying I'll become the minion of Satan if I read this book?!
:)
Posted by: Denny Burk | 02/17/2006 at 03:41 PM
Steve,
Thanks for the review. I don't agree with many of Driscoll's opinions and philosophies, but I think his is a voice worth hearing. I'm looking forward to reading this one.
Posted by: john chandler | 02/17/2006 at 05:28 PM
Steve, I'm glad that you reviewed Mark's book. Fide-O has been putting off an interview with Mark for some time waiting for the release of this book. We too believe that Mark is an interesting fella whom God is using in a tough part of America. May God's blessing continue to be upon him and you.
As I read your review, I am reminded of God's sovereignty (and longsuffering). Is it not amazing how that God uses us in spite of us. I hear the "weird" stories that Mark tells and think to myself, *we see through a glass darkly.* And we sometimes scratch our heads, look around nervously, and think, "I hope this is God, because I am outside of my understanding." We have all been there, and God uses it to remind us that this is bigger than us. And through it all, all of our faith must rest in sola Scriptura!
Posted by: Jason Robertson | 02/17/2006 at 06:11 PM
Sweet review.
Thinking of those supernatural stories, I have to wonder:
What if Mark Driscoll wrote a pop-up book?
Posted by: Jonathan Herron | 02/17/2006 at 07:14 PM
Thanks for the review.
So far, I'm just not impressed with Driscoll. A 10,000 member (even 4,000) church has nothing to do with emergence. It's more like condensation. Is there any wonder why he's distancing himself from his old friends? It appears that he's found mega church more exciting than simply emerging. Now he has something to protect.
Posted by: bill | 02/17/2006 at 07:19 PM
Bill, what does "simply emerging" mean?
Steve, Great review. I hold nearly all of Driscoll's major theological convictions that come through in Confessions so I loved it when I read it last fall. However, I will completely agree with you that this book is worthwhile for anyone regardless if they line up perfectly with Driscoll's theology or not. The book is full of wonderful theological summaries, charts, and one of the must brutally honest account from a church planter I've ever came across. I think everyone should give it a read.
Posted by: Michael Foster | 02/17/2006 at 07:36 PM
Bill-
What happens when you "emerge," reach the most unchurched culture in America, send out missionaries, plant churches left and right and still grow to 4,000? If God grows it into a "mega" church, is the pastor just supposed to walk away so he can remain "emergent"?
If his context changes, he has to change with it or else his leadership will stifle growth rather than help stimulate it.
Steve-
Nice job on the review. Are those reformed charismatics the hybrid nobody understands yet?
Posted by: Marty Duren | 02/18/2006 at 05:38 AM
Thanks for the review Steve. Very helpful. It's on my "Must Buy" list.
Posted by: Rob Boss | 02/18/2006 at 03:04 PM
Thanks, Steve, for this review. We share the same concerns regarding the video venue and such, but overall Driscoll is doing amazing work for God in a tough area.
It was a given that eventually the jealous, the curmudgeons, the truly reformed, and sundry contrarians would criticize him once he got "too big". (megachurch being generally defined as anything over 1000). Then again, 3000 came to faith in one sermon in Acts 2. Funny how we don't criticize the preacher in *that* ministry ;-)
Posted by: Phil | 02/18/2006 at 05:09 PM
Thanks for the review and recommendation, Steve. Another one to add to the wishlist. A guy like Driscoll is bound to shake up a lot of evangelicals who are leary of anything emerging - and that might be one of the best things to come out of this book in '06.
Posted by: AWHall | 02/18/2006 at 08:38 PM
Well, sorry. Don't want to disturb anyone. Don't mind me. Don't know what I'm talking about anyway. However, after almost 50 years of church, I'll never go to a "successful" church again. Some people will. They like success. Good for them.
Posted by: bill | 02/18/2006 at 10:59 PM
Bill,
I like success. Jesus being exalted. People entering into the community of faith by the thousands. Culture being shaped by the hands of believers to reflect their awesome Creator. Its wonderful. Its like Acts 2. And its what I see going on at Mars Hill. I like that. Good for me. ; )
Posted by: Michael Foster | 02/19/2006 at 12:52 PM
Sorry for the over reaction. I'm just so frustrated with the brouhaha lately over emerging church. The fact that the Spirit is moving in places and ways that go, not only unrecognized but unwelcome, just blows me away. I believe that there are changes happening under our feet that make up another Great Awakening. But, few will recognize it as such for several decades, if not a century.
BTW, emerging church (for me) is not a label nor a consortium. Neither is it man-made. It's not “new” church with couches and candles. It's happening in and out of organized religion. The fact that some homosexuals want in to the church should bring tears of joy, rather than hand wringing. Emergence is the beginning of a phase change. Like water that's been absorbing heat energy for a while but is just beginning to overcome latency and change into steam, this quantum phase change has been in the works for decades.
Perhaps you should read George Barna's latest book, also. But don't read it as a church growth book because Barna's checked out of that business. It documents what I've thought that I was seeing the past 15 years or so. He's found that as many as 20 million Americans are seeking a deeper relationship with God OUTSIDE of traditional church. Some are still in but may soon move out on their own. This movement that he calls “revolution” is the real emergence because it fits the scientific definition of emergence and the characteristics found in natural emergence. Life emerges.
What the trained leaders ought be doing is attempting to find these folk and encourage them and yes, even guide them. But moving them into a big building with programs and a media star, will just squelch the phenomenon. Someone mentioned the 3,000 added to the church in Acts. But they didn't join the church of Peter. They eventually went back to their villages and infected the people back home. If they'd been stored in a barn, the Jesus movement might have stopped right there. In fact, the real growth occurred elsewhere. The biggest mover we know of didn't follow the rules laid down by those in Jerusalem, did he? They eventually reached an agreement but the common folk tried to stone him. Why? Because they didn't see what Paul saw.
Posted by: bill | 02/20/2006 at 09:50 AM
I am in the middle of this book and couldn't agree more with what you have said so far. I don't agree with Mr. Driscoll on every theological issues but I agree with people hearing the Gospel and having their lives changed no matter the form the function takes.
Posted by: Jason | 12/21/2006 at 11:56 AM